Astrology Birth Chart GPT has been number one in the “Lifestyle” category since it came out!
I used the first prompt astrology AI suggested.
“What does my birth chart say about me?”
The GPT responded by asking for the date, time, and place of my birth.
I was surprised to receive a 488-word response.
That’s long for a GPT!
Though I’ve never developed an interest in astrology, I know my sun sign is Virgo.
The rest of the response was all new information to me.
You may have a serious approach to your emotions and seek security and long-term goals."
While I feel like that statement would apply to most female elder millennials, I appreciate the insight.
This is a detailed birth chart!
However, it doesn’t take AI to do a birth chart, just an extensive database.
A real test would be to prompt the GPT to apply this chart to a specific scenario.
Prompt: What Would Be a Good Career for Me Based on This Info?
GPT answered with the following suggestions:
Each of these was well-written and annotated with explanations.
Does it fit me?
I saw a lot more that did not fit me in this response than on the birth chart response.
I have intentionally avoided leadership and management roles, and I’m notoriously not an adventurer.
Reading that part made me feel seen!
Overall, I thought this AI was knowledgeable about astrology and good fun for someone with a casual interest.
However, it was fun and interesting for this skeptic to get a little extra insight.
Rizz GPT
My kids have been telling me to write about the Rizz GPT for a while.
They keep saying, “It’s hilarious!”
Prompt: What is Rizz?
The one quality answer I got out of this AI was with this prompt.
It gave an excellent definition of this Gen Z slang in layperson terms.
These were the answers.
If I were involved in training this AI, I’d consider this response a failure.
That’s a big miss!
Despite this red flag, I pressed on.
Is this AI supposed to be a caricature of Gen Z?
Perhaps I’m too old to get the joke.
Deep Game
For a writer, this AI was fun!
At first, I started with the prompt, “New Game.”
Deep Game responded by offering several genres of fiction.
I chose “war.”
The AI composed a 282-word response describing a WWII-like trench warfare scene.
Three trope characters were introduced, and the captain ordered a charge.
Deep Game then asked, “What do you do next?”
I responded, “Push forward, and yell a battle cry.
I may not believe in the cause, but I support my comrades.”
It said I crawled through the mud, inching towards the machine gun nest that had us pinned down.
This didn’t make sense to me.
This time, in response to the question, “What do you do next?
“, I asked my questions about the lack of cover.
Deep Game recognized the difference between me asking a question and continuing the story.
It rewrote the response, this time slightly different, but with more cover on the battlefield.
This time, my squad laid down suppressive fire as I leaped or crawled from cover to cover.
I was impressed by Deep Game’s recognition of the problem!
However, I was growing bored with the story.
I opened a new chat.
This time, instead of opening with the prompt, “new game”, I inputted a scenario.
“I’m stranded on a desert island with only a few supplies.
I’ve been collecting rainwater, but it hasn’t rained in days.
Supplies are running low.
I’m building a raft, and then I will head out of here!
Maybe I can make it to a shipping lane.”
Palm trees sway gently in the breeze, their fronds rustling softly.
The sand beneath your feet is hot, almost unbearable.
The writing is verbose and the story lines are archaic.
However, that’s typical of AI writing, in my experience.
This AI is as good as ChatGPT gets.
Of the three GPTs I tried, this is the only one I can see myself using again.
I’m thoroughly a non-fiction writer.
It could be fun to do with kids.
For those withChatGPT Plusaccounts, it can generate an image of the scene just described.
Just use the command “/visualize”.
I love seeing what people are doing with AI.
After this experiment, I will be browsing the GPT store more often!
